<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!-- generator="vbNews" -->

<rss version="2.0" 

	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"

	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"

	>

<channel>

	<title>World of Bioenergy</title>

	<link>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php</link>

	<description></description>

	<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://www.worldofcogeneration.com/vbnews/</generator>

	<language>en</language>



  
   	<item>

  		<title>Bioenergy potential to sustainably meet around 10% of World’s medium-term energy requirement</title>

  		<link>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=191</link>

  		<comments>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=191#comments</comments>

  		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>

  		<dc:creator>psmedia</dc:creator>

    	<category>BIOENERGY NEWS, WORLD</category>

  		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=191</guid>

  		<description><![CDATA[The report is the first integrated study of bioenergy to explore the issue in the context of both global environmental and development policy. It shows that in the medium term around 10% of the world’s energy needs could be met by sustainable bioenergy from biogenic residues and energy crops. About a quarter of the potential arising from energy crops is located in Central and South America. Sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, North America and China each account for around 15%, while India accounts for 6%. However, utilization of this potential should only be pursued if risks to food security as well as to nature conservation and climate change mitigation targets can be excluded. For this to happen, binding sustainability standards need to be introduced at national and international level.<BR><BR>Electric power, not petrol<BR>Bioenergy achieves the greatest contribution to climate change mitigation when it is used to generate electricity. The key approach is to deploy bioenergy to replace energy sources entailing high CO2 emissions, particularly coal. In the electricity sector the climate change mitigation effect of bioenergy is almost twice that of using biofuels for transport or when bioenergy is used to produce heat alone. Because of its high energy efficiency, cogeneration – involving the combined production of both power and heat – is always preferable to pure electricity generation. WBGU recommends that the generation of electricity from biomass be more vigorously promoted, but that promotion be restricted to sustainably produced bioenergy carriers. If biomethane is used to generate electricity, the climate change mitigation effect could be even greater if the CO2 captured in the production process of biomethane could be stored securely.<BR><BR>First generation liquid biofuels such as biodiesel from rape or bioethanol from maize are not suitable for mitigating climate change. If the cultivation of energy crops on agricultural land displaces food production and land elsewhere has to be cleared as a result, more greenhouse gases may be released than would have been the case if fossil fuels had been used. Second generation liquid biofuels, in which the whole above-ground part of the plant is used, perform no better in this regard. By contrast, the use of perennial tropical plants such as sugar cane, oil palm or jatropha – where they are grown on degraded land – can have a substantial positive impact on climate change mitigation. However, considerable damage can be done to the climate if tropical forest is cleared in order to grow these crops. WBGU therefore advocates that the promotion of liquid biofuels for road transport purposes be rapidly abandoned by removing blending quotas and instead expanding electromobility.<BR><BR>Residues are fuels<BR>Biogenic residues such as wood residue, liquid manure and straw are ideal sources of energy, because when used properly they entail very little risk to soils, water or the climate. In addition, they do not compete with food production. The generation of electricity from wastes and residues should therefore be particularly promoted.<BR><BR>Deploying modern bioenergy to tackle energy poverty<BR>There are some 50 developing countries in which traditional bioenergy, involving the burning of wood, dung or crop residues for cooking and heating, still accounts for more than 90% of energy use. As a result, more than 1.5 million people die each year of indoor air pollution. The more widespread use of improved wood or charcoal stoves or of micro biogas systems, and the production of vegetable oils from oil plants such as jatropha, represent an important and as yet insufficiently exploited lever for tackling poverty. These technologies should be promoted, since they can deliver significant improvements in the quality of life of many hundred millions of people within a very short time and at low cost. The opportunities for rural development associated with the cultivation of energy crops should be harnessed. As a first step, however, integrated strategies for bioenergy use and food security need to be drawn up jointly with partner countries.<BR><BR>Handing over the flagship report "Future Bioenergy and Sustainable Land Use"<BR>from left to right: Prof. Dr. D. Messner (member of the WBGU), Prof. Dr. J. Schmid (member of the WBGU), State Secretary K. Kortmann (BMZ), Dr. R. Grießhammer (member of the WBGU), Prof. Dr. N. Buchmann (member of the WBGU), Federal Minister S. Gabriel (BMU), Prof. Dr. R. Schubert (WBGU chairman), Federal Minister Dr. A. Schavan (BMBF), Prof. Dr. H. J. Schellnhuber (WBGU vice chair).<BR><BR>Please direct your queries to:<BR><BR>WBGU Secretariat<BR>Reichpietschufer 60-62, 8th Floor<BR>D-10785 Berlin<BR>Germany<BR><BR>Tel. +49 30 263948 12<BR>Fax +49 30 263948 50<BR>Email: <A href="mailto:wbgu@wbgu.de" jQuery1231243363670="45">wbgu@wbgu.de</A><BR>
<DIV style="CLEAR: both; PADDING-TOP: 15px"></DIV>
<!--
<a href="mailto:?subject=hi" target="_blank">AddedBy </a>
<br/>-->Source: <A href="http://www.wbgu.de/" target=_blank jQuery1231243363670="46">WGBU</A> ]]></description>

  	</item>

  
   	<item>

  		<title>US will not meet 2022 biofuels mandates</title>

  		<link>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=189</link>

  		<comments>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=189#comments</comments>

  		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>

  		<dc:creator>psmedia</dc:creator>

    	<category>BIOENERGY NEWS, NORTH AMERICA</category>

  		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=189</guid>

  		<description><![CDATA[<P>More stringent Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards, the renewable fuels standard (RFS), and an assumed rebound in oil prices while the global economy recovers are all factors in achieving this “no growth” scenario, according to the EIA. <BR><BR>“With overall liquid fuel demand in the AEO2009 reference case growing by only one million barrels per day between 2007 and 2030, increased use of domestically-produced biofuels, and rising domestic oil production spurred by higher prices, the net import share of total liquids supplied, including biofuels, declines from 58 percent in 2007 to less than 40 percent in 2025 before increasing to 41 percent in 2030,” the EIA stated in its Dec. 17 report. <BR><BR>Because oil imports are used largely for the production of liquid transportation fuels like gasoline, the impact of ethanol and other renewable fuels is significant. In 2007, homegrown ethanol production and use of 6.5 billion gallons displaced 228 million barrels of imported oil, resulting in $16 billion spent in the U.S. instead of being sent to foreign oil producers. </P>
<P>The EIA also stated that America’s ethanol industry would not meet the cellulosic requirement of the RFS by 2022. <BR><BR>In a statement, the Renewable Fuels Association said the EIA, by its nature, is confined to analyzing the situation at present and can’t take into account the speed with which America’s ethanol industry is innovating. “The renewable fuels standard is an ambitious target and one America’s ethanol industry is more than capable of meeting,” said Bob Dinneen, president of the Renewable Fuels Association. “The investments being made and research being conducted at the private and public sector level will ensure this industry rises to meet this challenge.” <BR><BR>The EIA does project steady, strong growth in renewable energy use through 2030, indicating a 3.3 percent annual growth rate – a reflection of the aggressive renewable fuels standard passed in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, as well as the effectiveness of state renewable portfolio standards driving renewable power generation. <BR><BR>“A sharp increase in the sale of unconventional vehicle technologies, such as flex-fuel, hybrid, and diesel vehicles, and a significant decline in the new light-truck share of total light-duty vehicle sales are projected,” EIA stated. “Hybrid vehicle sales (all varieties) increased from two percent of new light-duty vehicle sales in 2007 to 38 percent in 2030. Sales of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) will grow to 90,000 vehicles annually by 2014, supported by recently enacted tax credits. By 2030, PHEVs account for two percent of new light vehicle sales.” <BR><BR>An increased availability of domestic natural gas resources from unconventional onshore sources, the Outer Continental Shelf, and Alaska has led EIA to project that the net import share of total natural gas use will decline from 16 percent in 2007 to less than three percent in 2030.</P>]]></description>

  	</item>

  
   	<item>

  		<title>Annual Energy Outlook Confirms That Biofuels Will Increase U.S. Energy Independence</title>

  		<link>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=188</link>

  		<comments>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=188#comments</comments>

  		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>

  		<dc:creator>psmedia</dc:creator>

    	<category>BIOENERGY NEWS, NORTH AMERICA</category>

  		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=188</guid>

  		<description><![CDATA[Brent Erickson, executive vice president of the
Biotechnology Industry Organization’s Industrial & Environmental
Section, today released comments on the Energy Information
Administration’s 2009 Annual Energy Outlook:
<p>
“U.S.-produced biofuel combined with fuel efficiency will allow the
nation to meet growing transportation energy needs without increasing
imports of oil. That is a surprising conclusion from the Energy
Information Administration, whose Annual Energy Outlook projections use
the most conservative assumptions. The current projection demonstrates
that if the United States were to meet or exceed the targets set in the
Renewable Fuel Standard, we could begin to decrease our reliance on all
petroleum, create jobs and boost rural economies, and significantly cut
greenhouse gas emissions.
</p>
<p>
“There are more than 30 existing and planned cellulosic biorefineries
set to begin production of advanced biofuels in the next few years. Many
other projects and promising technologies are on the drawing board.
These pioneer cellulosic biofuel facilities will prove that the
technology works and that the industry can meet the goals established in
the Renewable Fuel Standard. With oil prices set to rise again, per the
projections, the need for domestically produced advanced biofuels should
remain a priority for U.S. policymakers and consumers.”
</p>
<p>
A map of these cellulosic biofuel facilities is available on the web at <a target="_blank" href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbiofuelsandclimate.wordpress.com%2Fabout%2F&esheet=5858302&lan=en_US&anchor=http%3A%2F%2Fbiofuelsandclimate.wordpress.com%2Fabout%2F&index=1" shape="rect">http://biofuelsandclimate.wordpress.com/about/</a>.
</p>
<p>
The Advanced Biofuels & Climate Change Information Center presents the
latest commentary and data on the environmental, greenhouse gas and
other impacts of biofuel production. Drop in and add your comments, at <a target="_blank" href="http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=smartlink&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbiofuelsandclimate.wordpress.com%2F&esheet=5858302&lan=en_US&anchor=http%3A%2F%2Fbiofuelsandclimate.wordpress.com%2F&index=2" shape="rect">http://biofuelsandclimate.wordpress.com/</a>.
</p>
<p>
BIO represents more than 1,200 biotechnology companies, academic
institutions, state biotechnology centers and related organizations
across the United States and in more than 30 other nations. BIO members
are involved in the research and development of innovative healthcare,
agricultural, industrial and environmental biotechnology products. BIO
also produces the BIO International Convention, the world’s largest
gathering of the biotechnology industry, along with industry-leading
investor and partnering meetings held around the world.
</p>
<br>]]></description>

  	</item>

  
   	<item>

  		<title>TurboSonic Wins US$1 Million Order From Biofuel Producer</title>

  		<link>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=187</link>

  		<comments>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=187#comments</comments>

  		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>

  		<dc:creator>psmedia</dc:creator>

    	<category>BIOENERGY NEWS, NORTH AMERICA</category>

  		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=187</guid>

  		<description><![CDATA[A WESP is the best available emissions control technology for collection of fine respirable particulate, condensable matter, and acid mist; respirable particulate has been identified as a preventable health risk. We anticipate that the equipment associated with this contract will be delivered to the customer in the current fiscal year.<br><br>Edward Spink, TurboSonic's CEO commented, "Another order from our longest-standing customer in the biofuels industry! We have experienced increasing interest in our SonicKleen(TM) WESP systems from biofuel producers, with three equipment supply contracts in-house for that industry alone. TurboSonic is recognized as a leader in air pollution control systems, with its proprietary designs known for advanced features and reliability. We believe that the momentum of "green" energy will continue to provide us with significant opportunities moving forward, especially as the international energy industry endeavors to meet the demand for renewable fuels, necessary to reduce carbon emissions."<br><br>TurboSonic Technologies (www.turbosonic.com) designs and markets air pollution control technologies to industrial customers worldwide. Its products help companies in the Cement and Mineral Processing, Ethanol, Metals & Mining, Petrochemicals, Power Generation, Pulp & Paper, Waste Incineration, and Wood Products industries meet the strictest emissions regulations, improve performance and reduce operating costs. <br><br>Certain statements in this press release are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company's actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statement. Factors that impact such forward-looking statements include, among others, changes in general economic conditions, interest rates, government regulations, and competition. For a discussion of such risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statement, see the annual report on Form 10-KSB and other documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.<br><br>TurboSonic Technologies, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: TSTA - News) <br><br>]]></description>

  	</item>

  
   	<item>

  		<title>Ensus on track to produce bioethanol on Teesside in summer 2009</title>

  		<link>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=186</link>

  		<comments>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=186#comments</comments>

  		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>

  		<dc:creator>psmedia</dc:creator>

    	<category>BIOENERGY NEWS, EUROPE</category>

  		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=186</guid>

  		<description><![CDATA[<p>And, as it welcomed the new European renewable transport fuels
target agreed by EU leaders last week, the company said its new plant
would "substantially exceed" new sustainability criteria for biofuels.</p>
<p>Ensus
is building the £250 million plant at the Wilton International
industrial park, which used to be home to chemicals giant ICI.</p>
<p>The
plant is expected to produce around 400 million litres of bioethanol a
year from wheat, through a fermentation process. The facility will also
produce around 350,000 tonnes of protein-rich residues that are to be
turned into animal feed.</p>
<p>It will need about 1.2 million tonnes of wheat each year, which is being sourced by commodities firm Glencore.</p>
<p>Middlesbrough-based
Ensus said the new EU Renewable Energy Directive agreed in Brussels
last week was "very positive news", with the targets set by the
Directive for 2020 offering a "stable framework for investment over the
next decade".</p>
<p>The Directive sets targets for 2020 including a 20%
renewable energy target for Europe as a whole, 15% for Britain
specifically, and also for 10% of transport energy to come from
renewable sources.</p>
<p>Alwyn Hughes, chief executive of Ensus, said:
"This is essential for companies like ours, who are investing in what
is a vital new industry to combat climate change and improve Europe's
energy security. This stability is vital to maintain the hundreds of
jobs our investment will be supporting in the North East of England."</p>
<h3>Sustainability criteria</h3>
<p>Along
with the headline targets, the new Directive sets certain criteria for
biofuels to count towards the 10% transport fuels target.</p>
<p>This
includes stipulations that biofuels must save at least 35% of
greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels, and from 2017 this
requirement jumps to 50%, with a 60% requirement for new installations.</p>
<p></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The EU Commission is to develop ways to measure greenhouse gas
emissions caused by indirect changes in land use, for example where
biofuel crops replace food crops or where cultivation encroaches on
uncultivated land.</p>
<p>Other aspects of the new 10% renewable
transport fuels target will see second generation biofuels - those
produced from wastes, residues or non-food crops - counting double
towards the target, as will electric cars.</p>
<p>Mr Hughes said the new
mandatory biofuels sustainability criteria would help to "sharpen the
distinction" between good and bad biofuels, and "will drive the
biofuels sector in the right direction for the long term".</p>
<p>Commenting
on his own company's plant, he said: "Thanks to our usage of European
wheat and our energy-efficient process we will substantially exceed the
sustainability criteria that have been set and make a real contribution
to reducing carbon emissions. In fact the bioethanol we supply will
generate carbon savings equivalent to taking over 300,000 cars off UK
roads."</p>
<p>The Ensus chief executive added that the animal feed
produced by the new plant would have a beneficial indirect effect on
land use abroad by replacing imports of soy often grown in deforested
areas.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<br>]]></description>

  	</item>

  
   	<item>

  		<title>Mexico and Italy agree on bioenergy projects</title>

  		<link>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=185</link>

  		<comments>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=185#comments</comments>

  		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>

  		<dc:creator>psmedia</dc:creator>

    	<category>BIOENERGY NEWS, EUROPE</category>

  		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=185</guid>

  		<description><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font>The
two countries signed a Memorandum of Understanding in November 2008,
and Mexico has already started a national energy progamme, which
includes a programme to save firewood and reduce the incidence of
respiratory disease. In 2008, 185 million Mexican pesos ($ 14 million)
will be invested for the installation of 120 thousand stoves in the
country. </font></p>
<p align="justify"><font>Another
component of the program will promote commercial forest plantations for
the generation of biogas and bioethanol. Mexico and Italy will promote
technical and scientific cooperation for the prevention of forest
degradation and sustainable forestry and exchange experiences on
bioenergy generation to promote sustainable development.</font></p>
<br>]]></description>

  	</item>

  
   	<item>

  		<title>Asia Bioenergy buys stake in Eco-Sponge</title>

  		<link>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=184</link>

  		<comments>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=184#comments</comments>

  		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>

  		<dc:creator>psmedia</dc:creator>

    	<category>MARKETS AND FINANCE</category>

  		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=184</guid>

  		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a filing to Bursa Malaysia, it said on completion of the deal,
the Asia Bioenergy group would hold 80% of the equity interest in
Eco-Sponge, which would become a subsidiary.</p>
<p>Currently, Asia Bioenergy, via its subsidiary Asia Bioenergy Research Sdn Bhd, owns 25% of the paid-up capital of Eco-Sponge.</p>
<p>The
proposed acquisition would allow Asia Bioenergy to have full control
over the Eco-Sponge and reap the benefits of all future sales of the
Eco-Sponge filtration compound. - Bernama</p>
<br>]]></description>

  	</item>

  
   	<item>

  		<title>Renewable Energy Can Provide Economic Stimulus</title>

  		<link>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=183</link>

  		<comments>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=183#comments</comments>

  		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>

  		<dc:creator>psmedia</dc:creator>

    	<category>BIOENERGY NEWS, NORTH AMERICA</category>

  		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=183</guid>

  		<description><![CDATA[The Biotechnology Industry Organization today called on Congress to include support for biorefineries, biobased materials, and energy crops in economic stimulus legislation.
<DIV class=p>Brent Erickson, executive vice president of BIO's Industrial & Environmental Section, said, "Congress has an opportunity to ensure that the United States' economic recovery is both financially and environmentally sustainable. Investment in advanced biofuels, biobased materials, and energy crops can produce thousands of new jobs and billions of dollars in economic activity. These investments can also help the United States reduce its dependence on oil and its emissions of greenhouse gases. </DIV>
<DIV class=p>"A cellulosic biorefinery that produces both advanced biofuels and biobased products could create as many as 2,200 new jobs and increase economic activity by more than $1 billion. Including support for new biorefineries as well as energy crop producers in economic stimulus legislation would promote construction of dozens of new biorefineries." </DIV>
<DIV class=p>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV class=p>Specific proposals to stimulate the economy and employment through commercialization of advanced biofuels and biobased products include: </DIV>
<DIV class=p>-- Extend the Cellulosic Biofuel Production Tax Credit Under current law, the production tax credit for cellulosic biofuels is available through 2011, but only a small number of commercial cellulosic facilities are expected to be placed in service by that time. This is a significant impediment to additional investment in this industry at a time when the drop in crude oil prices has further increased the challenge of commercialization. </DIV>
<DIV class=p>-- Increase Funding for Biomass RD&D and Biorefinery Construction USDA and Department of Energy programs to support research and development as well as construction of biorefineries have provided real benefits in helping commercialize cellulosic biofuels and biobased materials. A funding increase for these programs could accelerate technological developments and attract capital investment necessary to bring large volumes of cellulosic biofuels to the market within the next five years. </DIV>
<DIV class=p>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV class=p>-- Create a Production Tax Credit for Biobased Materials Advanced biobased materials, such as biobased plastics and renewable chemicals, reduce dependence on oil and greenhouse gas emissions by substituting biomass for petroleum. However, biobased materials are not currently incentivized in the tax code. </DIV>
<DIV class=p>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV class=p>-- Increase Funding for USDA Biobased Markets Program The USDA's Biobased Markets Program is intended to accelerate the commercialization of biobased products through a USDA Certified Biobased Labeling program and procurement program. Additional funding can speed implementation of the program and help develop the fledgling biobased products market. </DIV>
<DIV class=p>-- Fast Track the Biomass Crop Assistance Program The Biomass Crop Assistance Program helps farmers to establish, maintain, harvest, collect, store and transport next-generation energy crops. The program is critical to developing supply chains for advanced cellulosic biorefineries. </DIV>]]></description>

  	</item>

  
   	<item>

  		<title>Energizing The Energy Agenda</title>

  		<link>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=182</link>

  		<comments>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=182#comments</comments>

  		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>

  		<dc:creator>psmedia</dc:creator>

    	<category>BIOENERGY NEWS, NORTH AMERICA</category>

  		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=182</guid>

  		<description><![CDATA[<P>Over the summer, with gas prices soaring above $4 a gallon, energy briefly became a central concern for both presidential campaigns. But come September, roiling credit markets and falling stocks became paramount in the minds of Americans.</P>
<P>Energy issues didn't go anywhere, though, and Obama's likely nominee for secretary of energy, Nobel Prize-winning physicist Steven Chu, will have his hands full if he takes the job. Dealing with America's energy problems involves more than just lowering gas prices. If confirmed, expect Chu, who's also director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, to turn DOE into a hotbed for new energy ideas. Here's a look at the five big energy topics he and Obama will have to face: </P>
<P><STRONG>What to Do With Biofuels</STRONG> </P>
<P>Biofuels are now competing with $2-a-gallon gas. President and CEO of the Renewable Fuels Association Bob Dineen notes that in the 1980s a promising ethanol industry "collapsed with the collapse of oil prices." Chu will have to find a way to renew the public's (and investors') interest in biofuels.</P>
<P>It'll be difficult. "Everyone rallies behind the need for bio-fuels when oil is at $140 a barrel," says Eric Burgeson, vice president of BGR Holding LLC and former chief of staff at DOE. After food prices soared over the summer, blamed in large part on ethanol, expect Obama to rethink how he'll approach biofuels policies. </P>
<P><STRONG>Funding Nuclear Energy and Clean Coal Energy</STRONG> </P>
<P>Thanks to deficits and bailouts, Chu might not have nearly the wallet the Department of Energy might have hoped for this summer. Burgeson says that deciding whether to put more money into nuclear energy or clean coal technology will be a big decision for the new administration</P>
<P>The U.S. has coal galore. West Virginia, Texas and Wyoming are the biggest producers of coal in their respective regions. Right now, coal energy is responsible for about 50% of all electricity in the U.S. If there was a way to clean it up (through plans to sequester the emissions underground) rather than shut it down, the coal states and the atmosphere would be grateful.</P>
<P>Nuclear energy is another option. The Energy Information Administration reports show 24 proposed new nuclear plants, right now. Obama has said that he's not opposed to nuclear expansion, but safety precautions and guidelines for nuclear waste management need to be outlined first.</P>
<P>Money will dictate how serious the administration can get about clean coal and nuclear. For the 2009 budget, DOE has requested 3.3% less than its 2008 request for nuclear energy. However, Obama's budget request and an expected stimulus plan could change that. </P>
<P><STRONG>Climate Change</STRONG> </P>
<P>Creating policies that address climate change has been on the Secretary of Energy's radar for nearly a decade. A large theme in Obama's campaign, it's unlikely to be ignored. But don't expect cap-and-trade legislation in 2009--it's too expensive at a time when the economy is suffering.</P>
<P>Nonetheless, it looks like emissions-reduction advocates may now have a friend in the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Now that Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) is in charge (wrestling control away from John Dingell, D-Mich., who was seen as more resistant to environmental reforms), sweeping environmental legislation could soon follow. With Waxman in the driver's seat, if a cap-and-trade program for carbon emissions does take off sometime in the next four years, it could become the DOE's biggest program.</P>
<P><STRONG>Jobs</STRONG> </P>
<P>Obama is dedicated to creating more green jobs for Americans--it's a central plank of his recovery plan--by investing billions into renewable energy, which is "much more labor intensive," says Carol Warner, executive director at the Environmental and Energy Study Institute.</P>
<P>To fulfill this promise, U.S. energy regulators would need to overhaul the country's electric grid in order to get wind and solar power to the cities where it's needed. But wind and solar are used to generate electricity, and do little to offset demand for oil. That's where plug-in hybrids come in (maybe produced in newly vigorous GM factories, if the auto industry does indeed restructure as it has promised). With plug-ins, cars are fueled from an outlet instead of a gas pump, diverting all that old oil money to green-energy jobs at the car companies and at clean-tech electricity generators.</P>
<P><STRONG>Domestic Production</STRONG> </P>
<P>Khary Cauthen, of the American Petroleum Institute, says the next secretary of energy should focus on finding new domestic areas that have access to oil and natural gas--even if Congress lifted the ban on offshore drilling in October. </P>
<P>"The timing is just right that a new secretary of energy could come in and affirm and underscore the importance of access to domestic resources," Cauthen said. But low oil prices give the administration a reason to say new domestic production is no longer an urgent priority.</P>
<P>Where might these new domestic supplies of oil and natural gas come from? Right now, Appalachia is looking pretty good for natural gas. Geologists estimate that Marcellus Shale, extending through parts of New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio, could supply the U.S. with enough natural gas to last at least 14 years. </P>
<P>Also promising are the Barnett Shale formation in Texas and the Fayetteville Shale in Arkansas. Obama's energy plan mentions the Bakken Shale area in Montana and North Dakota as potentially 4 billion recoverable barrels of oil. Bonus: All that drilling would create some jobs too.</P>]]></description>

  	</item>

  
   	<item>

  		<title>Sugercorn could sweeten Midwest biofuels industry</title>

  		<link>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=181</link>

  		<comments>http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=181#comments</comments>

  		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>

  		<dc:creator>psmedia</dc:creator>

    	<category>BIOENERGY NEWS, NORTH AMERICA</category>

  		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.worldofbioenergy.com/index.php?do=viewarticle&amp;artid=181</guid>

  		<description><![CDATA[<P>The Brazilian ethanol industry has prospered by relying on ample supplies of sugarcane, which is easier than corn to turn into ethanol. Sugarcane has fueled a successful drive for Brazilian energy independence.</P>
<P>But sugarcane, which needs a long, warm growing season, remains little more than a tropical daydream for Midwestern farmers.</P>
<P>Now, though, biofuel boosters have something to talk about — “Sugarcorn.”</P>
<P>It’s being developed by Targeted Growth Inc., a Seattle biotechnology company that two years ago was searching for a crop that could be adapted to produce sugar in a way similar to sugarcane but able to grow in the Great Plains.</P>
<P>“One thing that jumped out was an opportunity to use corn,” said Donald Panter, senior vice president for crop development at the company.</P>
<P>Targeted Growth’s laboratory breakthroughs are being grown in test plots in Illinois and Indiana. More tests next year will be in other Midwestern states — possibly including Kansas and Missouri.</P>
<P>Corn has similarities to sugarcane, such as its sword-shaped leaves. Indeed, Sugarcorn is a takeoff on a type of maize grown in the tropics, which grows traditional ears of corn.</P>
<P>Researchers found that when the tropical corn has a longer growing day, such as those in the Midwest, it delays its flowering and sends more energy into making sugar in the stalk instead of producing starch in the corn.</P>
<P>Sugarcorn improves the process with genetic surgery.</P>
<P>The result? A corn field that doesn’t produce a single kernel and shoots corn stalks 15 feet high — about twice that of traditional corn.</P>
<P>Just like sugarcane, the sugar in Sugarcorn is easily squeezed out to use for ethanol.</P>
<P>Proponents said Sugarcorn could be a game-changer for the fledgling Corn Belt biofuels industry.</P>
<P>Why? Because it could double energy output per acre and reduce the energy needed to process the crop to fuel. That’s because the crop’s sugar skips the step where corn’s starch has to be converted into sugar before being fermented and turned into ethanol. If successful, Sugarcorn would make it easier to undercut the cost of conventional gasoline, which is important because ethanol has less energy per gallon than gasoline.</P>
<P>Sugarcorn’s potential will become clearer when it becomes commercially available, which Targeted Growth estimates will be another two years.</P>
<P>To be sure, more work remains to be done.</P>
<P>Much of that work will focus on increasing sugar yield. Also, field testing is measuring hardiness in Midwest weather conditions. Tests in Indiana and Illinois have been encouraging, prompting ethanol producers to express interest in the feedstock.</P>
<P>Such talks come at a crucial time for the ethanol industry, which recently saw a major producer file for bankruptcy.</P>
<P>VeraSun Energy Corp.’s stumble was triggered by corn prices, which briefly topped $8 a bushel in futures trading last summer. It then made a bad bet on locking in those higher prices, fearing that they would rise even more. Corn prices have fallen by roughly half since the summertime peak.</P>
<P>The broader industry’s troubles deepened recently when crumbling crude oil prices pushed conventional gas prices lower than ethanol for the first time in nearly two years, cutting deeply into ethanol demand.</P>
<P>The global credit crunch also has cast a shadow, prompting many ethanol projects to be canceled</P>]]></description>

  	</item>

  


	</channel>

</rss>

